Martin Wolf analyzed a recent GS research paper. Conclusion: Inflationary policies under Bush/Greenspan led to the credit bubble. How: inflation here decreased savings and increased borrowing.
Net result: inflation led to inflation, which led to devaluation (naturally, as a correction), but which has led to drastic inflationary policies to prevent depression. Maybe those gold bugs got it right after all.
If America can't compete globally as a manufacturer or farmer, our economy is doomed to stagnation, decreased wages, and general loser-ness.
Monday, June 15, 2009
Friday, June 12, 2009
Definition of Leadership
I found this on Paul Kedrosky's blog. Naturally, he defined it as group think/mob behavior. I'm an optimist. The first dancer is a leader.
Friday, June 5, 2009
Bond War: Krugy, Fergy, and Grossy
Daniel Gross opined on the ongoing battle to interpret the spike in long-term T-Bill rates. Is the spike a signal from the market that the USG's long term health is at risk (Ferguson's view)? Or, does it signal a retreat from safety (Krugman's view)?
My take on the matter was that it was a combination of factors. There are technical reasons to take cash out of 30 year Treasurys and reinvest them in foreign denominations. Namely, the US will lead the recovery, but it will still face a long and painful period of economic stagnation. This US-led recovery will enable smaller, more vibrant economies to flourish. In the short run, it will keep China afloat. In the long run, though, this means the US equity market and currency is overvalued. For an investment, it makes sense to take some portion out of the US.
I have come to realize, also, that many big money investors are extremely ideological and are tied to long-standing perceptions that Democrats are bad for business, despite the historical trends that suggest otherwise. There are bond vigilantes. They are Bernanke's audience.
Gross offers a rather different point of view, and one that I find convincing:
My take on the matter was that it was a combination of factors. There are technical reasons to take cash out of 30 year Treasurys and reinvest them in foreign denominations. Namely, the US will lead the recovery, but it will still face a long and painful period of economic stagnation. This US-led recovery will enable smaller, more vibrant economies to flourish. In the short run, it will keep China afloat. In the long run, though, this means the US equity market and currency is overvalued. For an investment, it makes sense to take some portion out of the US.
I have come to realize, also, that many big money investors are extremely ideological and are tied to long-standing perceptions that Democrats are bad for business, despite the historical trends that suggest otherwise. There are bond vigilantes. They are Bernanke's audience.
Gross offers a rather different point of view, and one that I find convincing:
Both the Fergusonians and the Krugmanites (of whom I count myself one) err in
reading too much into short-term fluctuations in bond prices. There's so much
more at work. Randall Forsyth of Barron's explains a technical reason for the short-term spike in 10-year and 30-year rates. Banks and financial institutions that own mortgages hedge their exposure to refinancing by buying and selling Treasury bonds. When mortgage rates start to rise, as they've done in recent weeks, institutions do
the opposite and sell. "While mortgage investors previously had bought
noncallable Treasuries to offset the risk of their mortgages, mortgage investors
have unwound that hedge, selling their Treasuries," Forsyth writes.
If nothing else, this three-way exchange demonstrates the difference between finance and economics.
This
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)